Saint Mary's College-Political Communication

Upper division Communication Studies course discussing politics from a communication perspective.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Presidential Debates: Why are they where they are?


While in class today, someone raised a good point about the location of the Presidential Debates. Why are these Debates held in the specific state, city, and venue that they are held in? This sparked my curiosity and I wondered what the answer to the latter question was as well as other questions. Have there been trends of the location of these debates? And finally, has holding a debate in a specific place had an enormous effect on the election as far as changing local citizen’s opinions on any one candidate?
Since the Commission on Presidential Debates, or CPD, has organized every aspect of a presidential debate from the size of podium used to the candidate selection criteria, they are obviously in charge of proposing and selecting the location of the debates. According to an article titled "How Presidential Debates Work: The Ideal Debate" by Josh Clark, selecting a neutral site for a debate can be difficult. Specific rules must be followed in selecting a debate’s location. Debates cannot be held in either candidate’s home state or hometown. Since most of these debates are held at universities (which I have not been able to find a specific reason why – if anyone can find out why please respond to this post!) the debate also cannot be held at either candidate’s alma mater. Debates are usually held in larger cities because the CPD has a minimum requirement of 3,000 available hotel rooms and a $7,500 application fee. There is no verified statement form the CPD that debates are typically held in “swing” or “battleground” but the neutrality of a debate is crucial, and therefore an undecided state would be a much more neutral site for a Presidential Debate.
There is also evidence from past elections that debates have been held in states that proved to be key in the outcome of the presidential election. In 2004, Ohio was known as a battleground state, and the last of the four debates was held in Cleveland, Ohio. According to CNN,the very first televised debate in the 1960 election between Kennedy and Nixon was held in Chicago, Illinois. Kennedy won that first debate and ended up winning Illinois, which proved to be a crucial state in helping Kennedy win over Nixon. (Click here for a full list of debates throughout history and their locations and dates) After looking over this list and counting how many times a certain state has hosted a presidential debate, including this year’s debates, I did find that Missouri has hosted a debate five times. This is two more than the states who have hosted it three times (Florida, Kentucky, and California). I found this trend to be odd considering that Missouri is classically a strong Republican state.
Two of the states (Colorado and Florida) that were locations in this election’s debates, as determined by The New York Times Electoral Map, are labeled at this moment “toss-up states” that could help either candidate win the entire election if they were to get the majority vote in that state. The other two states selected for the presidential debates were New York, a strongly democratic state, and Kentucky, a strongly Republican state. This balance of location partisanship is also evidence to the CPD’s policy of neutrality in the presidential debate sites.
A lot of the information that I found could merely be called coincidental, but I believe that the location of these crucial presidential debates has a lot more of an effect on the presidential election than one might think.

6 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

This topic is very interesting. I never gave much thought to how (or who) chose where the debates would be held. I think the technicalities, though a bit strange, make a lot of sense; I do find myself wondering how people come to an agreement on what is and is not acceptable in the location of the debate. It seems to me that if it is limited to states where the candidates did not grow up, live, or their alma maters then what is stopping them from putting even more limitations on the location? There will be supporters and non supporters at every debate no matter where they are located

6:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think these rules and regulations that you found are really interesting...but, this is the US of A after all, and I wish every state had a fair chance! I would have loved to see a debate in a place near to SMC, or even at SMC. Like Bridget said above, there will be supporters of each candidate at every debate, so I don't see why the rules can't be loosened up a bit.

8:54 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Lindsay I agree with you. I think that every state should have a fair chance. Meg, really cool that you went and found the facts on why they choose the locations that they do. I would love to sit in on a meeting where they are choosing the locations for debates. What questions to they ask? What do they take into consideration? I feel like this could be something that takes a good amount of time to figure out because there are a lot of pieces in the puzzle that makes up a debate.

5:21 PM  
Blogger Mileva Brunson said...

This is such an interesting point of presidential debates that not many people may notice. I appreciate that you gathered such interesting facts about the process of choosing a location!
I wonder if the American public truly recognizes the detailed planning that goes into choosing locations that have the potential to influence voters. I also am curious about the atmosphere that these universities have building up to and on the actual day of the presidential debate. It's very interesting that they tend to take place on college campuses, and it makes me curious whether that is an attempt to connect college age voters to the election or just to have a more formal setting.

2:26 PM  
Blogger Hailey Shannon said...

This was actually really cool & interesting I found myself saying "why do they have the debates at these random small schools I've never heard of?" during the last debate. It's interesting to see that there are so many rules and regulations on just the location of the debates because it's not something I've ever really thought about. I agree with you Megan, when saying that the legation of the debates can effect the overall outcome of the election!

6:39 PM  
Blogger London said...

I really liked your post because I never knew the rules to determining a debate location. I thought it was interesting how having a debate in a certain state influences the candidates ability to win the state.... in that case, is it truly fair? Moreover, it was a good article.

8:23 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home