Romney not Out of the Running Yet
There
is wide speculation that because of Romney’s “47%” comment made in early May,
his campaign is over. I think this is being hard on Mr. Romney, I mean he can’t
be the only one to say something “ineloquently”, right? I decided to research this topic and found an
interesting article in the New York Times Romney
is latest in a Long Line to Trip Over a Tongue; this article verified my
thought, and gave me a good laugh in the process.
One
first needs some background to understand Mitt Romney’s current predicament. At
a closed fundraiser in May, he was tape recorded saying that nearly half of the
people, or 47%, do not pay taxes and therefore will not vote for him. He said
these people are, “dependent upon government, who believe that they are
victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them” (Rutenberg, Parker). Many Democrats and some
Republicans were upset by this statement. Romney stands behind his statements, giving
an interview with Fox News saying “The president’s view
is one of a larger government; “I disagree, I think a society based on a
government-centered nation where government plays a larger and larger role,
redistributes money, that’s the wrong course for America.” Romney is hoping
bringing up the large number of Americans dependent on government will help
define the philosophical choice for voters in the upcoming election.
So, the big question is,
is it over for the GOP Presidential Nominee? I am going to turn to history for
the answers. In the race for the White House, 47% of candidates have had self-inflicted
blows to their reputation. In 2008, Senator
John McCain said “The fundamentals of the
economy are strong.” This was not
what Americans wanted to hear from a presidential candidate, considering this statement
was made in the midst of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and one of the worst
economic recessions since the Great Depression. During a college event in Pennsylvania
in 2004, John Kerry had this to say about money to pay for operations in
Afghanistan and Iraq, “I actually did
vote for the $87 billion, before I voted against it.” After George W. Bush’s
campaign exploited this comment, it caused Kerry to be thought of as confusing
an unreliable. The cause of Al Gore’s reputation an embellisher was a quote during
a CNN interview, “I took the initiative
in creating the internet.” Critics leaped at the chance to exploit Mr. Gore’s
statement and with some minor misstatements during a debate, well let’s say the
Electoral College doesn’t like a liar. President Clinton had a confession to
Americans during a Houston Fundraiser in 1995 “You think I raised your taxes too much. It might surprise you to know
that I think I raised them, too.” Although he made both Democrats and
Republicans angry, he won re-election easily with some good opponent attack
strategies. In 1980, Ronald Reagan said, “Approximately 80 percent of our air
pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation.” The Democrats used
this statement to try and cast Reagan as an extremist goof, but between
Americans being fed up with the economy and the signature, “There you go again”
rebuttal to Jimmy Carter during a debate.
With these examples of
successes and failures, it is clear that Mr. Romney is not out of the running
quite yet. I think it depends on how he
handles the situation- I think he made some good choices in not denying or
negating his statements. It was also very good strategy in choosing Fox News as
his first and only interview on the subject. I also think how he handles the
rest of his campaign will be crucial in his success- and to be honest I am excited
to see how it all ends in November!
3 Comments:
Hannah, thanks for sharing the link showcasing other candidates "tripping over their tongues". I enjoyed watching both those who went on to lose and to win elections make mistakes similar to Governor Romney's. I would agree that the 47% comment and other ill-advised comments from the fundraiser will not be the deciding factor in the election. There is never one deciding mistake or triumph in a political campaign. Instead, elections are won through a culmination of hard work and integrity.
I agree with Gina, Hannah. I really liked the link with all of those examples and how some candidates were able to recover and some were not. An interesting question to think about is whether such intense focus on a single statement is consistent with the idea of legitimate political communication.
I like your optimism!! After all that has happened since you first posted this blog, I think it is still okay to say that he still has not quite lost the race. The numbers are not promising, as they favor Obama, but I do like how you said that basically history has proven that nothing is impossible in politics. I am also very anxious and excited to see how all of this plays out in the next couple of days!
Post a Comment
<< Home